Legal Opinion
Hyde v. Fisher
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided January 28, 2009No. 30648PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Judge.
Steven Lee Hyde appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In Hyde v. Fisher; 143 Idaho 782, 783-84, 152 P.3d 653, 654-55 (Ct.App.2007), we summarized the facts and initial procedure of this case:
Hyde is an inmate committed to the custody of the Idaho Department of Correction (IDOC [or the Department]) under the laws of the state of Idaho. Since 1993, Hyde has been housed at the Idaho Maximum Security Institution (IMSI), under the supervision of respondent, Warden Greg…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Knows His Gun v. MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2012
- Marks v. InsleeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021