Legal Opinion

Jackson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 2008No. 04-CF-570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

Appellant Keith Jackson argues that his conviction for manslaughter should be reversed based on what he contends was the trial court’s error in denying his motion to conceal from jurors the teardrop-shaped tattoo beneath his left eye. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

I. Background

On January 29, 2004, a jury found Jackson guilty of manslaughter (the shooting death of Clinton Hodges), possession of a firearm during a crime of violence (PFCV) (predicated on manslaughter), possession of a prohibited weapon, possession of an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Winfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MinterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. People v. MinterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API