Legal Opinion

Burton, Lingo & Co. v. O'Niell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1894No. 577PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

The appellee recovered from the appellants the sum of $600 in this action, which is for libel. The verdict of the jury requires findings of fact as follows:

The plaintiff, Mrs. O’Niell, was during the years 1890 and 1891 a widow with several children, engaged in the business of keeping a boarding house in Fort Worth, Texas. The appellants were a mercantile firm doing business in that city.

Mrs. O’Niell was indebted to one C. A. Hall; the latter owed the appellants, Burton, Lingo & Co., the sum of $35.18, besides interest. The appellants claimed that Hall had given them an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bradstreet Co. v. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huber v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State Medical Ass'n of Texas v. Committee for Chiropractic Education, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Horn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API