Burton, Lingo & Co. v. O'Niell
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
TARLTON, Chief Justice.
The appellee recovered from the appellants the sum of $600 in this action, which is for libel. The verdict of the jury requires findings of fact as follows:
The plaintiff, Mrs. O’Niell, was during the years 1890 and 1891 a widow with several children, engaged in the business of keeping a boarding house in Fort Worth, Texas. The appellants were a mercantile firm doing business in that city.
Mrs. O’Niell was indebted to one C. A. Hall; the latter owed the appellants, Burton, Lingo & Co., the sum of $35.18, besides interest. The appellants claimed that Hall had given them an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bradstreet Co. v. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Huber v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- State Medical Ass'n of Texas v. Committee for Chiropractic Education, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Horn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939