(PC) Rannels v. Smith
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL W. RANNELS, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00049-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION 13 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED 14 SMITH, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Daniel W. Rannels moves the Court to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. 18 (Doc. 2.) According to the certified account statement submitted by the California Department of 19 Corrections and Rehabilitation, Plaintiff has received, on average, monthly deposits of 20 approximately $400 to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- People's Outfitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933