Legal Opinion

Henri Bendel, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 20, 1950No. C. D. 1254PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

Tbe suit listed above presents for our determination tbe question of tbe proper classification of certain imported merchandise wbicb was classified as embroidered corsets, and duty was levied tbereon at tbe rate of 75 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 (a) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by tbe trade *7agreement with France, T. D. 48316. Claim is made in the protest that said merchandise is properly dutiable at only 55 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 (c) of said act and the aforesaid trade agreement.

It was agreed between counsel at the trial that “if this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Field & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. Kayser & Co. v. PevnyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. WaentigU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
  5. Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API