Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Monroe

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 6, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Jennie Fisher against Robert P. Monroe and others to recover damages for an alleged wrongful breach of contract. From an order of the general term of the city court affirming a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff, (20 N. Y. Supp. 664,) defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This is the second appeal to this court, (12 N. Y. Supp. 273,) and it is unnecessary to state the facts further than will be needed to understand the questions raised on this appeal. The action was for damages sustained by the plaintiff, an actress, by reason of her alleged wrongful discharge by the defendants, who were theatrical managers and proprietors, before the end of the season specified in the contract between them. The chief ground of the reversal on the former appeal was that the contract would not necessarily be terminated by a mere temporary disability of the plaintiff, but that,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cook v. . BarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Everson v. CarpenterNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Williams v. . SargeantNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Fisher v. MonroeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
  5. Parry v. American Opera Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Watson v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Derry v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stolz v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. In Re Petroleum Carriers Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  5. Chevrolet Motor Co. v. McCullough Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API