Chevrolet Motor Co. v. McCullough Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The parties were operating under a contract which was precarious, in that it was terminable, upon a very short notice. The ease was submitted to the jury on the theory that the defendant, having committed a total breach of contract by taking the agency entirely out of the hands of the plaintiff and placing it in the hands of another corporation, .could not thereafter avail itself of any of the provisions of the contract, among which was the right to terminate the same upon 5 days’ notice. The jury were instructed that the plaintiff could recover for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Indiana Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Derry v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Gurfein v. WerbelovskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Cronemillar v. Duluth-Superior Milling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Ellis v. Dodge Bros.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buggs v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Tamm v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Denver Publishing Co. v. KirkColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Osborn v. Commanche Cattle Industries, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Hammond v. C. I. T. Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.