Legal Opinion
Gale v. Board of Supervisors
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1932No. Calendar 36,943PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
In the year 1920, the distinction between township, city, and county poor was abolished in Oakland county by appropriate action of the board of supervisors, and the county assumed the exclusive support of the poor. However, on October 9, 1931, the board, by a two-thirds vote, adopted the following resolution:
“Resolved:
“1. That the distinction between township, city, and county poor is hereby adopted in the county of Oakland under the provisions of Act No. 146, Pub. Acts 1925, and amendments thereto, the same being 2 Compiled Laws 1929, §§ 8208-8282, to take.effect January 1, 1933.
“2. That the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leatherock v. LawterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Atchison Board of Education v. De KaySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Osborn v. Charlevoix Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Gaston v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- City of Biddeford v. YatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Matthews v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Majid Damghani v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- McNeil v. Charlevoix CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- McNeil v. Charlevoix CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.