Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McNeil v. Charlevoix County

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2009No. Docket 134437Published

1ConcurrenceCavanagh, J.

I concur in full with the majority opinion, including its conclusion that the clean indoor air regulation (CIAR) should be upheld. I would hold that the CIAR, including §§ 1010(F), 1011, and 1012(F), is within the scope of the authority delegated by the state constitution and the applicable statutes to the Northwest Michigan Community Health Agency (NMCHA) and the county boards of commissioners. I further agree that the non-retaliation provision of the CIAR, § 1011, falls within the public-policy exception to the common-law at-will employment doctrine. I write separately in order to clarify…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Suchodolski v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sandra Humenny v. Genex Corporation, Inc. Carol ValenticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Dudewicz v. Norris Schmid, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Allstate Insurance v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Vagts v. Perry Drug Stores, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API