Legal Opinion

State v. Eckert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 28, 2008No. C041579CR, A129968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for murder, advancing two assignments of error. First, he contends that the court erred in admitting a recorded telephone conversation in which he directly contradicted his trial testimony on a key fact. According to defendant, the state’s failure to discover and turn over the recording until after defendant had testified amounted to a violation of the discovery statutes, and the court should have imposed a sanction of suppression. Second, defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his affinity with white supremacist…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. HamptonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Villanueva-VillanuevaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. BasuaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API