Legal Opinion

John Rogers v. Alaska Steamship Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1961No. 16862_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit in admiralty brought by and on behalf of seamen to recover additional wages and contributions to certain trust funds on the alternative theories of quantum meruit or unjust enrichment. The district court entered a final decree severing the claim of one of the libelants and dismissing the action as to all other libelants. The latter now appeal, raising questions concerning abuse of discretion in dismissing the second amended libel, the necessity of findings of fact and conclusions of law, the joinder of parties and causes, and the appropriateness of class…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Studio Carpenters Local Union No. 946 v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. John L. Rogers v. Alaska Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marciano v. Fahs (In Re Marciano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. John J. Rogers v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Wall Street Traders, Inc. v. Sociedad Espanola de Construccion NavalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  4. John Rogers v. Alaska Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. Marciano v. Fahs (In Re Marciano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API