Matter of Marriage of Knoll
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*486ROSSMAN, J.
Husband appeals the trial court’s invalidation of the antenuptial agreement entered into by him and his wife.1 We find the agreement to be valid and reverse the trial court. Our review in dissolution cases is de novo; however, we give deference to the trial judge’s opportunity to observe the witnesses first hand. McCoy and McCoy, 28 Or App 919, 923-24, 562 P2d 207 (1977).
The parties began dating in 1976, when wife was living in Portland. At that time, husband was 40 years old and wife was 30. Both parties had been married before. Wife had been working for 12 years as a dental…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Bauer v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Kosik v. GeorgeOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Merrill v. Estate of MerrillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Matter of Marriage of CowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of MatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Marriage of BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Matter of Marriage of EltzrothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- In re the Marriage of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Sogg v. Nevada State BankNevada Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.