Legal Opinion

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Metz

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 24, 1972No. 5-6009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellees, Ezra Metz and his wife, owned a 2.3-acre tract of land on which were situated a combined grocery store and service station, their own residence (attached to the store), and another residence occupied by Mrs. Metz’s grandmother. The property is at the intersection of two paved state highways, No. 18 and No. 135.

The highway commission brought this action to condemn .39 of an acre of the tract for highway purposes. The taking does not directly touch the improvements on the land, but it will adversely affect the access to the property and will reduce the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Comm'n v. DarrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Muswick Cigar & Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Railroad v. AshabrannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. BowmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API