Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Perryman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
The judgment appealed was a jury award to appellees in an eminent domain proceeding. Appellant contends that the verdict for $26,000 was not supported by substantial evidence. We agree and remand the case for a new trial.
Appellees presented four witnesses on the question of just compensation. They were appellee Robert M. Perryman, Jackson Ross, Merle Lemley and Jim Pledger.
The lands involved were taken for construction and relocation of approaches to the New Dardanelle Bridge and highway facilities. The lands actually taken consisted of 520 square feet with a depth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- L. R. Junction Ry. v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Arkansas State Highway Comm'n v. DarrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Desha v. Independence County Bridge District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Avery v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Avery v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. StallingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. MetzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.