Legal Opinion

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Perryman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 15, 1969No. 5-4960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

The judgment appealed was a jury award to appellees in an eminent domain proceeding. Appellant contends that the verdict for $26,000 was not supported by substantial evidence. We agree and remand the case for a new trial.

Appellees presented four witnesses on the question of just compensation. They were appellee Robert M. Perryman, Jackson Ross, Merle Lemley and Jim Pledger.

The lands involved were taken for construction and relocation of approaches to the New Dardanelle Bridge and highway facilities. The lands actually taken consisted of 520 square feet with a depth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. L. R. Junction Ry. v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. Arkansas State Highway Comm'n v. DarrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Desha v. Independence County Bridge District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Avery v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Avery v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. StallingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. MetzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API