Legal Opinion

Franklin (Teron) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2013No. 60618Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Winship off him, but as he attempted to get up, she grabbed and pulled on his leg before he was able to get away. Franklin testified that he and Winship spoke the next day and that she accused him of breaking her arm during the altercation. Failure to collect evidence Franklin argues that all evidence concerning the bicycle should have been suppressed because the police officers failed to collect and preserve the potentially exculpatory evidence. Franklin failed to object at trial, therefore we view for plain error. See Leonard v. State, 117 Nev. 53, 63,

17 P.3d 397, 403-04

(2001). We conclude…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Pellegrini v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API