State v. Lamb
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
In his first assignment of error, the defendant argues that his motion to dismiss the charge of conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon should have been allowed for insufficiency of the evidence. He says that Lovely Lorden provided the only eyewitness testimony to the occurrence and that her testimony showed there was no discussion of the crime by any of the men. It .is possible that the men discussed the crime when they were behind Herman’s Place, says the defendant, but this is only speculation. The defendant contends we can just as easily infer that the three men…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ValentineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. BrockingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.