Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Saul
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 14, 1961No. [No. 172, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.
When the Circuit Court for Montgomery County found for the defendant-seller (Helen McG. Saul) and entered a judgment for costs in her favor against the plaintiff-buyer (John E. Schneider) in the action brought by the buyer against the seller for damages arising out of an alleged breach of contract, the buyer appealed.
The buyer contends that the guarantee by the seller that a building permit to erect a filling station could be secured placed the responsibility for the delays in the issuance of the permit on the seller for which the buyer was entitled to damages.
The case has been submitted to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vincent v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Speed v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Alois v. WaldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Iron Clad Manufacturing Co. v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- K & G CONSTRUCTION CO. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- C. W. Blomquist & Co. v. Capital Area Realty Investors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- AirFacts, Inc. v. Diego De AmezagaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- U.K. Construction & Management, LLC v. GoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- (1996), Maryland Attorney General Reports1996
- AirFacts, Inc. v. Diego De AmezagaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.