Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Henry

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 14, 2015No. 14-1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Three bank robberies, two confessions, one defendant, and an assortment of firearms charges make up this case. Michael Henry confessed to the first two robberies but disclaimed any involvement in the third. The jury found that Henry committed all three robberies. The jury also convicted Henry of using a firearm in each robbery — not because he carried a gun but because his associate did. Because the prosecution failed to prove everything needed to pin the associate’s gun on Henry in the second and third robberies, see Rosemond v. United States, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. GoochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Xiaorong YouCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Christopher RitcheyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. PradoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Michael HenryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API