Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 15, 2009No. Case 1:08 cv 139PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by all defendants. The matter has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision.
I. Factual & Procedural Background
In its Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), plaintiff City of Cleveland (the “City” or “Plaintiff’) asserts a single public nuisance cause of action against each of the following corporate defendants: Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., Bear Stearns & Co.,, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- City of Cleveland v. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- Little Hocking Water Ass'n v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. Takata Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.