People v. Maljan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
The defendant, Peter Maljan, was convicted of embezzlement in the superior court of Fresno County, and appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
There was evidence from which the jury were justified in finding the following facts, among others, in this case:
The defendant, Peter Maljan, was a member of a copartnership composed of himself, his brother, and another person, doing business in Fresno as packers, brokers, and shippers of fruit. The prosecuting witness, Homsy, delivered his crop of grapes to the Maljan firm for shipment to, and sale…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. WardripCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- People v. ArrasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. SpearsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Holland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.