State v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentStroud, Judge
I must respectfully dissent, as I believe that the Supreme Court’s mandate to this Court requires us to find no plain error as to defendant’s conviction for second-degree kidnapping.
As noted by the majority opinion, this case is on remand from the North Carolina Supreme Court solely for this Court to re-examine the issue of the propriety of the jury instructions as to the “removal” element of second-degree kidnapping under plain error review in accord with State v. Lawrence,_N.C._,723 S.E.2d 326 (2012) and to consider defendant’s additional remaining issues which must be addressed if…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- State v. MaynardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Wilkes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.