Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2012No. COA10-1072-2Published

1DissentStroud, Judge

I must respectfully dissent, as I believe that the Supreme Court’s mandate to this Court requires us to find no plain error as to defendant’s conviction for second-degree kidnapping.

As noted by the majority opinion, this case is on remand from the North Carolina Supreme Court solely for this Court to re-examine the issue of the propriety of the jury instructions as to the “removal” element of second-degree kidnapping under plain error review in accord with State v. Lawrence,_N.C._,723 S.E.2d 326 (2012) and to consider defendant’s additional remaining issues which must be addressed if…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. MaynardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Wilkes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API