Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 17, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*791Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

By an indictment returned by the grand jury of Pike county, September 12, 1923, the appellant, Jim Mullins, was charged in the following terms with the offense of drunkenness:

‘ ‘ The said Jim Mullins in the said county of Pike on the 11th day of Sept., 1923, and within twelve months before the finding of the indictment, did unlawfully, wilfully and knowingly, be and become drunk and in an intoxicated state-, by the use of liquor or other intoxicating beverages, on a public highway, at a church, a -school, a store and other public places. ... ”

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  2. Morgan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Estes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Alverson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Bicknell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API