R.E. Whittaker Co. v. Offutt
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
1Opinion of the Court
MOTTO, J.,
Before the court for disposition is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In their motion, the defendants contend that the current state of the record, including the testimony at all prior proceedings and evidence developed by deposition in discovery and otherwise, establishes that there exists no evidence to support any cause of action set forth in the complaints filed in the above captioned cases. The *493complaints allege that defendants Offutt and Stephenson breached written and oral contracts of employment and engaged in a conspiracy with defendant Peek to unlawfully compete…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.