Legal Opinion

R.E. Whittaker Co. v. Offutt

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County

Decided April 16, 2013No. 11794 OF 2008, C.A.; 10055 OF 2009, C.APublished

1Opinion of the Court

MOTTO, J.,

Before the court for disposition is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In their motion, the defendants contend that the current state of the record, including the testimony at all prior proceedings and evidence developed by deposition in discovery and otherwise, establishes that there exists no evidence to support any cause of action set forth in the complaints filed in the above captioned cases. The *493complaints allege that defendants Offutt and Stephenson breached written and oral contracts of employment and engaged in a conspiracy with defendant Peek to unlawfully compete…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API