Legal Opinion

Parker v. Action Contracting Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2003No. WD 61256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

This appeal arises from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s determination that Missouri Employee’s Mutual Insurance Company (MEM) is liable, as an insurer, for workers’ compensation benefits awarded to Randall Parker. MEM’s failure to comply with Rule 84.04 results in our dismissal of the appeal.

Factual and Procedural History

On October 11, 2000, Randall Parker was severely injured as the result of a work-related accident. Parker sought workers’ compensation benefits from his employer, Action Contracting Corporation (Action). Action notified its worker’s’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stufflebean v. Crete Carrier Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. McClain v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Burney v. Foremost Signature Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Waller v. A.C. Cleaners Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Null v. New Haven Care Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Parker v. Doe Run Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. EUGENE RACHINSKY, Claimant-Appellant v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, Employer-Respondent, and MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Emmanuel Kennedy v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API