Williams v. Burdick
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: John P. Kavanaugh, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Moore. This is an action by Arthur P. Williams, Edwin H. Sayre, William L. Juhring, and Francis J. Dessoir, partners under the firm name and style of R. C. Williams & Company, against A. C. Burdick & Co., Inc., to recover damages for the breach of an alleged agreement.
Read the full summary
From Multnomah: John P. Kavanaugh, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Moore. This is an action by Arthur P. Williams, Edwin H. Sayre, William L. Juhring, and Francis J. Dessoir, partners under the firm name and style of R. C. Williams & Company, against A. C. Burdick & Co., Inc., to recover damages for the breach of an alleged agreement. It is stated in the complaint that at all the times mentioned therein the plaintiffs were partners as R. C. Williams & Co., and the defendant was a corporation; that on June 14, 1910, a contract was effected, whereby the defendant agreed to sell and deliver to…
1Opinion
Decided October 1, 1912.
On Petition for Rehearing.
(126 Pac. 603.)
2Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
A petition for a rehearing criticises a statement found in the' former opinion, to the effect that the errors relied upon for a reversal of the judgment related to the conclusions of law, and that there was no controversy respecting the findings of fact. It is contended that such declaration is incorrect, and that the entire dispute in this court related to the findings of fact, in support of which no legal evidence was offered.
7. The abstract sets forth what was supposed only to be a general summary of the findings of fact, not…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Moody v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Frush v. City of East PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1877
- Bourne v. ShapleighMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880