Legal Opinion

Frush v. City of East Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, McArthur, J.:

The respondent entered into a contract with the city of East Portland to improve a certain section of one of its *282streets, including a sidewalk and gutters, for which the city agreed ‘ ‘ to pay the amount found due, by warrants to be drawn on the fund to be collected and be paid into the city treasury for that purpose.” By stipulation filed it is admitted that the work itas duly performed and accepted, and that at the time of acceptance there was a balance found due the respondent amounting to four hundred and twenty-eight dollars. For this sum the city drew its…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Moody v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Portland Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. City of East PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Smith v. RoadsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Richardson v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API