Legal Opinion

Missouri Ethics Commission v. Cornford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1997No. WD 53613PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMART, Judge.

The Missouri Ethics Commission (“Ethics Commission”) appeals the judgment of the circuit court affirming a decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (“AHC”) that Ernest Comford was not required to file a personal financial interest statement with the Ethics Commission pursuant to § 105.483 RSMo 1994.1 The Ethics Commission contends on appeal that the AHC erred in its determination because the mere designation of Comford as a “decision-making public servant” by the employing entity required that he file a financial interest statement under the applicable statutes. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Tax Commission v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. McCollum v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Evangelical Retirement Homes of Greater St. Louis, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Division of Employment Security v. Taney County District R-IIISupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  5. Geriatric Nursing Facility, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerald Geier v. Missouri Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Missouri Ethics Commission v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Missouri Ethics Commission v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API