Missouri Ethics Commission v. Cornford
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMART, Judge.
The Missouri Ethics Commission (“Ethics Commission”) appeals the judgment of the circuit court affirming a decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (“AHC”) that Ernest Comford was not required to file a personal financial interest statement with the Ethics Commission pursuant to § 105.483 RSMo 1994.1 The Ethics Commission contends on appeal that the AHC erred in its determination because the mere designation of Comford as a “decision-making public servant” by the employing entity required that he file a financial interest statement under the applicable statutes. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Tax Commission v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- McCollum v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Evangelical Retirement Homes of Greater St. Louis, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Division of Employment Security v. Taney County District R-IIISupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Geriatric Nursing Facility, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gerald Geier v. Missouri Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Missouri Ethics Commission v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Missouri Ethics Commission v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997