Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cruse v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1995No. 81733Published

1Dissent

OP ALA Justice,

with whom SIMMS, Justice, joins, dissenting.

Today’s opinion holds that the provisions of 12 O.S.1991 § 100,1 the so-called “saving statute”, will protect from destruction by lapse of time claims under the Government Tort Claims Act [GTCA].2 Because I view § 157(B)3 not as a true statute of limitations *1006but rather as a condition upon the exercise of a newly-created right — the common law’s ius maius 4 — I cannot accede to today’s pronouncement.

The court’s analysis is likely to affect adversely the symmetry and stability of our public tort system by bringing about at least two…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API