Legal Opinion
Ronald Engstrand v. Carolyn Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 4, 2015No. 14-2702PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Ronald Engstrand, a 52-year-old former dairy farmer, applied for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Insurance because of pain caused by his diabetic neuropathy and osteoarthritis. After a hearing, an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) concluded that Engstrand is not disabled. The ALJ reasoned that Engstrand’s account of his limitations is not credible and that his treating physician is not entitled'to deference. The Appeals Council denied review, and the district court upheld the ALJ’s decision. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the district…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Craft v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Jennifer Moore v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Linda Roddy v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Cheryl Beardsley v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Rebecca Pepper v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Anne Hill v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Schloesser v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Kathy Stark v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Melissa Vanprooyen v. Nancy A. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Daniel Keys v. Nancy A. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.