Legal Opinion
Anne Hill v. Carolyn Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 3, 2015No. 15-1230PublishedCited by 192 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
An administrative law judge disbelieved Anne Hill’s testimony that she could not sit, stand, or walk for extended periods of time and denied her application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. In this action arising under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Hill challenges this adverse credibility finding as well as the ALJ’s assessment of her residual functional capacity. We agree with Hill that the ALJ’s credibility analysis was flawed and remand the case to the agency for further proceedings.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Evidence of Hill’s Disabilities
Hill, who is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Robbins v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Craft v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Linda Roddy v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Cheryl Beardsley v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by192 opinions
- Stacy Lewis v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Loveless v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Paul Lambert v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Ashley Gerstner v. Nancy A. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Margaret Cullinan v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.