Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 1992No. 90-1157PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants, Edward Marshall and Thomas Joe Calloway, appeal departure sentences which were imposed after a remand from this court to the trial court for resen-tencing. We reverse.

Marshall and Calloway were involved in an armed burglary. Calloway and a code-fendant entered a hotel room of a vacationing couple, struck the 69-year old husband with a baseball bat, and terrorized the wife. Marshall acted as a lookout outside the hotel room. Marshall and Calloway were convicted for their role in the crime in 1987. They were given departure sentences. The trial judge dictated the reasons for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Ree v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Barfield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. State v. LylesSupreme Court of Florida · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Waychoff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Menard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API