Drolshagen v. County of Wayne
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
I am not in accord with the opinion of Mr. Justice BUTZEL. His opinion is based upon the proposition that because the probate judge has the power to remove the register of probate at will, the term is indefinite and the board of supervisors had the right to decrease the salary.
The general rule is that if the term is indefinite, the officer's salary may be reduced or enlarged. In Bodell v. Cityof Battle Creek, 270 Mich. 445, we said, "The inhibition against the raising or lowering of salaries applies only to the definite, and not to the indefinite term of an official."
The real issue in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Townsend v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Trainor v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- County Commissioners v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Bayley v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Taylor v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chamski v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Chamski v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939