Legal Opinion

State v. Vincent

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 1, 2017No. 1406139CR; A159015Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, and tampering with physical evidence, ORS 162.295. Defendant was sentenced to 10 days in jail and 18 months of bench probation. Among other terms, the judgment imposed $1,000 in court-appointed attorney fees and $60 on each conviction as a “Mandatory State Amt.” On appeal, defendant challenges the imposition of those monetary awards, which we address below. We reject without discussion defendant’s first assignment of error.

As to the “Mandatory State Amt,” defendant argues that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CoverstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. MachadoUmatilla County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. DyllaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API