Legal Opinion
United States v. Valdez
District Court, D. Utah
Decided May 4, 1993No. 93-CR-28 BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The defendant, Jose Gobea-Espinoza, has made a motion pursuant to Rules 8 and 14, F.R.Cr.P. to sever Counts 1 through 8 from Counts 9 through 13 of the superseding indictment and for a separate trial for Count 14. Defendant is charged in the superseding indictment in this case with defendants Marco A. Valdez, Anthony Valdez, and Roberto Estrada. Counts 1 through 8 charge only defendants Marco Valdez and Anthony Valdez with distribution of a controlled substance (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)) and use of a communications facility for the distribution of a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Dante Angelo Grassi and Jack Louis GailCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. William Esch, United States of America v. Linda EschCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Rodolfo Morales, Paul Kolb, Jorge ManzanoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. GarganeseDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994
- United States v. Olmedo-CruzDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2000