Legal Opinion

United States v. Garganese

District Court, D. Utah

Decided July 1, 1994No. 93-NCR-13 SPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants, Robert Garganese and North American Enterprises, have made a motion for severance of their prosecution on the superseding indictment in this case from that of the other defendants (File Entry #334). The motion alleges defendants North American and Garganese are charged in counts 36 through 52 of the indictment (this applied to a prior indictment) and in two forfeiture counts, 53 and 54. The defendants allege that North American and Garganese are not charged in Counts 1-35 which pertain only to other defendants. Count 1 is a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols ChagraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. J. Joseph Kennedy, United States of America v. Robert J. Myers, United States of America v. Lawrence F. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. DunneDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API