Black v. Miller
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Case for fraud and deceit in inducing plaintiff to purchase a note. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
It appears that on January 8, 1875, defendant and J. H. Kingery executed a promissory note for $370, with interest at 10 per cent., payable to Almira Post or bearer two years after date.
On May 1, 1885, plaintiff purchased the note for $225, at which time the note bore 15 separate indorsements of money paid, the last indorsement showing a payment of $30 on May 2,1884. These payments were made by Mr. Kingery in his life-time, without the knowledge of defendant. Defendant made no payments thereon, nor did any other act which prevented the running of the statute of limitations against the note so…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- White v. . MadisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Rodermund v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Merchants' Bank of Canada v. SchulenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Johnson-Brinkman Commission Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Creek v. LaskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Gamble v. GambleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- MacHine Co. v. Owings.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.