Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Eblen
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
The questions involved in the trial of this case are disclosed by the issues submitted to the jury, and for a full statement of the pleadings we refer to the opinion reversing the judgment on a former appeal, reported in (Tex. Civ. App.) 55 S.W.(2d) 1060.
On this trial the jury found in substance that appellant’s operatives failed to ring the bell in approaching the crossing on the belt track where the accident occurred; that such failure was negligence and a proximate cause of the collision and injury; that they failed to keep a proper lookout; that such failure was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Co. v. MotwillerTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Barron v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Galveston H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Corn v. Crosby County Cattle Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Strauss v. Continental Airlines, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Alpine Telephone Corp. v. McCallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Flores v. De GalvanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. of Texas v. WaddlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Weatherhead v. VavithisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.