Legal Opinion

Esarey v. Pierson, Rec.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1923No. 11,374PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, C. J.

January 25, 1918, on complaint of a stockholder and without notice, a receiver was appointed for the Standard Electric Manufacturing Company. A few days later, the defendant appeared and filed answer. The court, after a hearing, refused to set aside the appointment. After the expiration of the ten days allowed for appealing, a number of stockholders and the directors of the company held a meeting and employed counsel and authorized them to take such steps as were deemed necessary to have the receiver discharged. February 23, a motion for a new trial was filed and thereafter overruled.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Thomas v. Knights of Maccabees of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. People v. Commercial Alliance Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Assets Realization Co. v. Defrees, Brace & RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Dolph v. Cincinnati, Bluffton & Chicago RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Republic Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. People Ex Rel. Schacht v. MAIN INSUR. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. O'Malley v. Continental Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Pratt v. Robert S. Odell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. McConnell v. ALL-COVERAGE INS. EXCH. AUTOMOBILE AND FIRECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API