Legal Opinion

State v. Jinkerson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1991No. C8-90-1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence. Appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for conspiracy to possess more than 10 grams of cocaine because it was based solely on uncorroborated accomplice testimony. Appellant also argues that his sentence was based on sentencing guidelines that are unconstitutional because they violate equal protection. We affirm.

FACTS

On October 7, 1989, appellant and two accomplices purchased an ounce of cocaine in a parking lot in Mankato. The seller was an undercover police officer, and the three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. WittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. HouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Jamestown Terminal Elevator, Inc. v. KnoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. LemireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API