Legal Opinion

Niemeier v. Rosenbaum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1936No. 26141. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff, suing on an account assigned to him by the firm of Bronson, Jones & Bronson, lawyers of Seattle, brought this action against defendant, asking a judgment on account of legal services rendered by his assignor. The complaint alleged the performance by the firm of attorneys of legal services for defendant and at his request, in one paragraph stating that such services were of the reasonable value of $893, which sum defendant promised to pay, and in the next paragraph alleging an account stated in the sum of $868, and that the account through error failed to include one item in the sum…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garey v. City of PascoWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Carmack v. DrumWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Smith v. KneisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Davis v. FalconerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Smith v. KneisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In RE ESTES v. HoppWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Turpen v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. City of Seattle v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton v. Phillips Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API