Legal Opinion

Pearsall v. Virginia Racing Commission

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided January 20, 1998No. Record 0696-97-2PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, Judge.

Robin J. Pearsall and the Monument Avenue Park Association (Association) contend that the trial court erred in ruling that the Association was not a “person aggrieved,” see Code § 59.1-373, and that, for that reason, the Association lacked standing to appeal from a decision of the Virginia Racing Commission, an administrative agency. 1 We disagree.

The Virginia Racing Commission (Commission) regulates horse racing and pari-mutuel betting in the Commonwealth, including the issuance of licenses to persons or entities desiring to operate race tracks and betting facilities. Code §§…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cupp v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. W. S. Carnes, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  5. Virginia Beach Beautification Commission v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Philip Morris USA v. CHESAOEAJE BAYSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  2. Association of Merger Dealers, LLC v. Tosco Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  3. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. State Water Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  4. Health Systems Agency of Northern Virginia, Inc. v. StroubeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  5. Carolinas Cement Co. v. Zoning Appeals BoardWarren County Circuit Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API