Legal Opinion

Miller v. Consolidated Royalty Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1927No. Nos. 7845, 7846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

These suits

were consolidated for final hearing. They present in substance the same controversy. The bill in each case was dismissed .and plaintiff has appealed. He claims that he is the owner by purchase of an undivided one-eighth interest in certain oil-bearing lands in the Salt Creek Field, Wyoming, that some of the defendants, without the knowledge or consent of his grantors, obtained leases on said lands from the United States under the Act of February 25, 1920 (41 Stat. 437 [Comp. St. § 4640:*4 et seq.]), and are now producing and for several years have been producing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mining Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Dravo v. FabelSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Hodgson v. Federal Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Taylor v. Salt Creek Consol. Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  5. Riggles v. ErneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. HumphrysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  2. Small v. ShureSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Nygard v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Cummings v. AndrewjeskiDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API