Legal Opinion
Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 30, 1988PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
226 N.J. Super. 132 (1988)
543 A.2d 985
PETER PROCANIK, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ROSEMARIE PROCANIK, PLAINTIFF, AND ROSEMARIE PROCANIK AND MICHAEL PROCANIK, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
JOSEPH PETER CILLO, HERBERT LANGER, ERNEST P. GREENBERG, AND HAROLD A. SHERMAN, DEFENDANTS, AND LEE S. GOLDSMITH AND GREENSTONE, GREENSTONE AND NAISHULER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 10, 1988.
Decided June 30, 1988.
Before Judges PRESSLER, BILDER and SKILLMAN.
Marc S. Friedman…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Gleitman v. CosgroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ziegelheim v. ApolloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- 2175 Lemoine Ave. v. Finco, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Boyle v. WelshNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Manoir-Electroalloys Corp. v. Amalloy Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.