Legal Opinion

Grays Harbor Construction Co. v. Paulk

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1934No. 25318. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff brought this action seeking a money judgment against the defendant Paul Paulk, the county clerk for Thurston county, and the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, the surety upon his official bond. The trial resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,081.04, with interest thereon, from which the defendants appeal.

The facts are not in dispute, and a brief summary thereof will present the question for determination upon this appeal. As already indicated, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nash v. . FaulknerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Duke v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Fairchild v. HedgesWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Smith v. Patton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Wilson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State ex rel. O'Connell v. EngenWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Stevens County ex rel. Tim Rasmussen v. Travelers Surety & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API