Phillips-Van Heusen Co. v. Shark Bros., Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, Justice.
Both cases, by order of this court, were consolidated for appeal and are in substance identical except as to amount and name of the plaintiff party. (They had been consolidated for trial.) Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation [Van Heusen] and Enro Shirt Company [Enro], each a foreign corporation and general creditor of Kingsman Co., Inc. [Kingsman], a domestic corporation, brought separate actions .for the balance due on an open account for merchandise sold and delivered to Kingsman, doing business as Shark’s Mens Store in the city of Devils Lake. Both actions were commenced…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Danks v. HollandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Plastray Corporation v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Mongeon v. BurkebileNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Schoonover v. Morton CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Roque v. City of RedlandsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hilzendager v. SkwarokNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Airvator, Inc. v. Turtle Mountain Manufacturing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Biesterfeld v. Asbestos Corp. of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Collection Center, Inc. v. BydalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.