Legal Opinion

Sandvig v. Sessions

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 27, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2016-1368Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTIAN W. SANDVIG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-1368 (JDB) 1 WILLIAM P. BARR, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are academic researchers who intend to test whether employment websites discriminate based on race and gender. In order to do so, they plan to provide false information to target websites, in violation of these websites’ terms of service. Plaintiffs bring a pre-enforcement challenge, alleging that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API