Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Paskoff & Tamber, LLP

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael D. Stallman, J.

*1126It is ordered that this motion for renewal and reargument is granted only to the extent that reargument is granted, and upon reargument, the court adheres to its prior decision and order, and the motion is otherwise denied.

In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs allege that they hired defendants to represent them in a private adoption from a Russian woman. According to plaintiffs, defendants did not prepare a binding extrajudicial consent from the birth mother for the adoption in compliance with Domestic Relations Law § 115-b. In the underlying…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Douglas v. DelpTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rangolan v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Wolkstein v. MorgensternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Wilson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Miranda v. SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API