Legal Opinion · Dissent

Josey v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 17, 1929No. 12747Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Dennis, refusing a motion of the defendant to vacate an attachment. The motion was made upon grounds that suggest that the attachment was both irregularly and improvidently issued. As far back as the case of Monday v. Elmore, 27 S. C., 126, 3 S. E., 65, 66, the late Chief Justice Simpson very clearly explained the difference between an attachment irregularly, and one improvidently, issued: “An attachment is irregularly issued when it appears upon the face of the proceedings that there is no ground for the attachment; in other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hart v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Miller v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  3. M. Ferst's Sons & Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. United States Capsule Co. v. IsaacsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Addison v. SujetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API