Legal Opinion

Williams v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 31, 2001No. 00-2694PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company (“Defendant”)’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Kevin D. Williams (“Plaintiff 1 ')’s Title VII complaint for employment discrimination. Defendants contend that Plaintiffs Title VII claim is time-barred and that equitable tolling is not proper in the instant case. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.

I. Background Facts

On August 4, 2000, Plaintiff filed an employment discrimination complaint under Title VII. Plaintiffs complaint alleges that…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Butler v. Proman StaffingDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025
  2. Davis v. City of LavergneDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
  3. Harris v. SuchDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
  4. Hudson v. McDonoughDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
  5. Lawson v. Teleflex MedicalDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API