Legal Opinion
GameFly, Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 11, 2013No. 11-1179PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Chief Judge:
GameFly, Inc. (“GameFly”) and Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix”) use the United States Postal Service (the “Postal Service”) to mail DVDs to their customers. GameFly filed a complaint under 39 U.S.C. § 3662(a) with the Postal Regulatory Commission (the “Commission”) accusing the Postal Service of providing preferential rates and terms of service to Netflix in violation of 39 U.S.C. § 403(c). The Commission issued an order finding that the Postal Service was indeed discriminating against GameFly, but its remedy left much of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amer Fed Govt 2924 v. FLRACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
3Cited by6 opinions
- Douglas Carlson v. PRCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. U.S. E.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. U.S. Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States Postal Service v. Postal Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.